
BLAKE LIVELY'S SCARLETT LETTER A aka ANITA'S THEORY
UNEXPECTED TURN OF EVENTS
While we were happily distracted and HIGHLY entertained by the composition of the PR-dipped-filings, presented from both sides, nothing could have prepared us for the raunchy, scandalous, low-blowing lawsuits crossfire by the TRUE STARS of this trainwreck of a lawsuit: the PR teams.
Leslie Sloane, Vision PR, Inc.
Leslie Sloane (LS) has been Blake Lively's publicist for many years. Although the exact start date of their professional relationship is not publicly detailed, Sloane has been working with Lively since the early 2010s. With such a long history, and LS having a front-row seat to Lively’s antics, there's absolutely no way she’s unaware of how Blake has dragged everyone around her down with her career-ending lies, launched like a slingshot straight at JB and the Wayfarer team.
Stephanie Jones (SJ), Jonesworks LLC
The reason we're all tangled up in this mess—the antagonist in everyone's story, Stephanie Jones—was once the publicist for both JB and Wayfarer Studios. Jonesworks and Jennifer Abel had a longstanding relationship with Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer, with a monthly fixed fee of 25,000$ as of 2020, before severing ties with her in August 2024, due to contract breach by Stephanie Jones. Wayfarer Studios and Baldoni are both located in California, and their account was led by partner at the firm, Jennifer Abel.
Jennifer Abel (JA), RWAcommunications, former Jonesworks LLC
JA was appointed as Jonesworks LLC in 2023, leading their California branch, where she managed Baldoni's and Wayfarer’s accounts. JA resigned from Jonesworks LLC on July 10th, 2024, giving 6 weeks notice, with departure date being set for 23rd of August 2024.
Melissa Nathan (MN), Agency Group PR LLC (TAG)
The Agency Group team specializes in communications, crisis, reputation management, personal publicity and digital team services across entertainment, innovation, corporate and litigation clients. Melissa Nathan, founder of the company, is brought in to help with crisis management August 2nd, 2024, after Blake Lively's last blackmail to get the undeserved PGA mark and online speculation as to JB’s absence as a lead character and director of the movie, fearing her endless demands right before the premiere, ostracizing Baldoni further, as each day passed.
Jed Wallace (JW), Street Relations, Inc. aka (The One Who Shall not be named)
JW joined the crisis management team for Baldoni and Wayfarer at MN’s recommendation, assembling a strategic defense against potential backlash from Blake's tone-deaf promotion of the film. Additionally, the team braced for any explosive stories that might surface regarding Lively's leash around SONY’s neck, the infamous 17-point extortion clause.
A STANDING OVATION IS WELL DESERVED LADIES (and Jed, but he wasn’t IN the drama, so the applause solely reserved for the she-roes who have brought BL and RR’s scheme to light, exposing true faces of those who apparently think the public is stupid). WELL DONE, Ladies, WELL DONE!
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED BETWEEN AUGUST 6 AND AUGUST 21, 2024:
August 6, 2024:
At the premiere of the Film in New York, Baldoni is instructed to walk the carpet separately from the rest of the cast. However, he is quickly ushered off the press line when it is announced that Lively is on her way. Once inside the theater lobby, security escorts Baldoni and his family to the basement to prevent a potential encounter with Lively and the cast. They are then taken to a basement stockroom for holding while Lively, Reynolds, and the rest of the cast walk the pink carpet. After the lobby clears, Baldoni, Heath, and their friends and family are ushered to a small theater at the end of the hallway for a SEPERATE screening. - Exhibit A, page 114
August 7, 2024:
Articles about a potential cast feud began circulating online, and social media chatter intensified. - Exhibit A pages 114-115
August 8, 2024:
Online chatter escalates and cast tensions become headlines across major publications. - Exhibit A pages 116-117
Same day, Melissa Nathan (MN) and Leslie Sloan (LS) reach an agreement that neither will communicate directly with a reporter prior to informing the other. - Exhibit A, page 117-118
August 9, 2024:
The two articles mentioned Blake Lively's lawsuit and CRD complaint get published in Daily Mail and Page Six.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13727789/it-ends-blake-lively-justin-baldoni-feud.html
https://pagesix.com/2024/08/09/entertainment/justin-baldoni-made-blake-lively-uncomfortable-sources/
August 10, 2024:
“The Blake Lively interview that made me want to quit my job.” AKA the infamous “congratulations on your bump” video was posted by Kjersti Flaa.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2-2RBi1qzY&t=77s
Contrary to multiple articles, this video DID NOT RESURFACE BUT WAS SHARED FOR THE FIRST TIME though it served Lively's interests to spread the narrative to fit her "smear campaign." Kjersti Flaa has repeatedly explained on her channel, as well as in several interviews, why she chose to release this video for the first time, despite it being recorded back in 2016.
“"It's kind of a coincidence that it happened now, because I was contacted last week by a reporter that said he's just done a press junket and his interview was confiscated afterwards.
He asked me, 'Have you ever experienced anything like that?' And I said, 'No, I've never got my tape confiscated, but of course I've had very unpleasant experiences'."
https://www.newsweek.com/blake-lively-interview-kjersti-flaa-reason-justin-baldoni-1940286
August 12, 2024:
Organic articles emerged directly related to how Lively was promoting the Film. See, e.g., Natasha Jokic, Here’s What’s Going On With The ‘It Ends With Us’ Drama
- Exhibit A, pages 134-135
August 12, 2024:
Wayfarer refuses to put out the statement scripted by BL and RR, refusing to shoulder the blame for Blake Lively’s karmic unceremonious fall from grace.
- Exhibit A, page 135-136
August 13, 2024:
Lively goes into damage control, posting about Domestic Violence and negative stories start coming out about Baldoni.- Exhibit A, page 137
August 21, 2024
:
Stephanie Jones (SJ) unlawfully confiscates Jennifer Abel’s (JA) phone.
On the same day that Abel’s phone is seized by her employer, Stephanie Jones, Nathan receives a call from Leslie Sloane (Lively’s publicist) telling her that she has “seen her texts” and that she will be sued. - Exhibit A, pages 151-152
BRYAN FREEDMAN HAS ENTERED THE CHAT
Given Blake's ultimate goal of securing the movie rights— If they had truly uncovered a coordinated smear campaign through text messages, why didn’t they confront Baldoni and Wayfarer then? Why not demand a public accountability for the smear campaign and leverage it to pressure Baldoni into selling the movie rights? Something Lively openly admitted she would be interested in, if Colleen got her rights back, in an interview. Why not make him release a statement now, after they refused on the 12th of August, taking the fall for her damaged reputation, when you had something in your hand which you are apparently using to sue him in court for a smear campaign and SH? There was a clear disconnect between who they had proven to be until they got their hands on Abel's phone and who they became after, until the lawsuit.
What did BL’s team uncover in the text messages that lead to to edit messages and present them to NYT, alleging a smear campaign but those same messages wouldn’t be enough to strongarm JB and Wayfarer Studios LLC into selling them the movie rights? - Yep, they discovered Bryan Freedman. :D
The below listed texts FROM ABEL'S PHONE, further confirmed my suspicion that Baldoni and Wayfarer had started documenting EVERYTHING, to arm themselves to fight BL and RR, had they threatened them again. All of this conspired in before 21st of August, and by the looks of it, Bryan Freedman had joined the Wayfarer parties as their litigator, way back on August 13th. And since all of this was in Abel's phone, Jones and Lively parties all saw the evidence Wayfarer parties had been collecting over months, arming themselves with a CIVIL EXTORTION LAWSUIT, hence BL and RR not being able to get the rights to the movie.
THEIR FACES MUST HAVE BEEN PRICELESSSSS!!!
1.June 26-28, 2024: PGA mark email to the Lawyer
Jamey Heath has written and email to their lawyers, stating that they had given a letter of recommendation for BL to get PGA accreditation because they felt entrapped. -Exhibit A, page 93
2. August 2, 2024 6:18 AM: Jennifer Abel encourages JB in a text message
Abel: The truth is your defense. You have done nothing wrong and there is over a year's worth of facts and paper trails and people who can go on background as your defense... It’s a good thing we all prepare for the worst outcome because then if and when it’s not as bad, we are OVER prepared.
Baldoni: please get the lawyer hired asap
Abel: It’s my understanding “redacted” is already all over that but I’m here to help!
-Exhibit A, page 109
3. Same day, 2 August, 2024 Jennifer Abel writes to Melissa Nathan at 13:47:
Abel: “... I’m going to confidentially send you something he’s texting me and Jamey on the side just to arm you before this call…”
- BL’s Amended Complaint against Wayfarer parties, page 67 of PDF
Interestingly, BL does not disclose what this confidential information was, while she has full access to JA and MN’s conversations but includes this text insinuating something nefarious happened behind the scenes.
4. 12 August, 2024 at 18:52: After BL and RR demand JB and Wayfarer take the blame for BL’s public backlash:
Nathan: Career killer for them and wayfarer. No. Hafe to fight it. At what point do you fight? It’s now. Lawyer up. NOW
Abel: This is SO CRAZY
Nathan: Honestly, I’ve never had anything like it. Can he please hire a lawyer?
Abel: He needs to. He has one. But he needs a litigator.
Nathan: Get bf he’s waiting and will also take on wme
-Exhibit A, page 136
5. 13 August, 2024 at 03:42 AM: As per BL’s Amended complaint
MN: Can I start a Signal thread with you, me and Jed. Just in case you need him to connect you to Bryan because they’re very close
Blake, that same paragraph 221, identifies Bryan to be “Mr. Freedman.” - page 69
As the case unfolded and more court filings came in, three specific filings snapped everything into focus for me. I went back and re-read every single page—every word—with fresh eyes, and this time, I read carefully. Line by line, it all started to make sense.
-
Ryan Reynolds Motion To Dismiss
-
Jed Wallace’s Declaration Under Oath.
-
Blake Lively’s Motion to Dismiss and Cal. Civ. Code Section 47.1
BRYAN FREEDMAN HAS ENTERED THE CHAT
In order to decipher THE mystery man, I had to go back to the same formula that helped me understand other ambiguous questions I had yet to understand; complex questions usually have simple answers, and we tend to overlook them.
The answer was yet again, SO SIMPLE! Just think about it:
What have JB and Wayfarer been avoiding like the plague? Blake Lively publicly smearing their names.
Let’s think logically. After agreeing to BL’s 17-point demand and still being unable to finalize her actor’s contract with Wayfarer, why would they take the risk of provoking her? If they knew she was capable of launching a full-scale reputational attack, based on 10 months of experience with her capabilities to do so, why would they go to such lengths to anger her—only to sabotage themselves at the premiere? It defies ANY reason.
This is precisely why I believe there was never a smear campaign to begin with. This realization also reframed my perspective on Jed Wallace’s role. His sworn declaration—made under penalty of perjury—stating that he did not engage in any smear campaign suddenly made perfect sense. Why? Because it was simple. If no smear campaign existed, there was nothing for him to lie about.
SO I revisited the whole exchange between the PR team and Wayfarer team, to see if my theory tracked.
As seen on pages 169-204, First Amended Complaint filed by Bryan Freedman on 31 January 2025, there’s a clear and relentless effort to SUPPRESS negative stories about BOTH Baldoni and Lively. Which makes sense, because he wanted to protect his name, while not provoking Lively's team.
In one of the messages, Melissa Nathan and Jennifer talk about how they have confused people, and it goes to having different stories where some people talk about the feud, some talk about BL’s marketing campaign, some talk about JB being difficult, while suppressing the TWO ARTICLES, which were mentioned in BL’s complaint.
ARTICLE 1: DAILY MAIL DAILY MAIL ARTICLE, AUGUST 9
August 8, 2024: Leslie Sloane and Melissa Nathan agreed that neither would speak to a reporter without first informing the other. However, just minutes later, LS violated this agreement, defending BL by disparaging JB to the reporter. This was in response to the reporter mentioning that BL was being labeled as difficult.
In an effort to salvage her client’s reputation, LS completely shifted the blame onto JB, claiming that the entire cast disliked him and that it had nothing to do with BL. She then subtly pressured the reporter, warning, “This will not look good for your site.”
Unaware of LS’s actions, MN later shared the same reporter’s request for comment, only to find that LS had significantly altered the narrative in the published story.
Following BL’s CRD complaint, the same DailyMail reporter sent screenshots proving that, it was LS who had communicated with him the “insider” story and that in August JB was “hated by the cast” but now she’s saying BL was SEXUALLY ASSAULTED.
- First amended complaint, page 122-129
This was the article that gained no traction—a direct result of LS completely throwing JB under the bus in a desperate attempt to salvage BL’s reputation, which was crumbling due to her own actions and those of her team. Which prompted the hiring of JED WALLACE, to suppress a negative story about JB, which could stir up the pot.
In the article, Baldoni is described as “chauvinistic, borderline abusive” “has a dismissive attitude towards Blake” and “his approach was chauvinistic, creating a tense atmosphere on set.”
Meanwhile, Stephanie Jones, unaware of the truce between BL and JB’s PR team, was spiraling from losing clients. In a desperate attempt to salvage her standing with the Wayfarer team, she reached out to The Daily Mail to offer a comment, completely derailing their strategy.
After realizing her mistake, she tried to make amends with JB and the Wayfarer team, reminding them of their standing contract, all while ignoring the client's explicit request not to speak to any reporters. In response, Wayfarer put her contract on hold, which only infuriated SJ. To clear her name, she turned to LS and her team, where they allegedly concocted a plan to confiscate JA’s phone upon her departure. (pages 144-153)
ARTICLE 2: PAGE SIX PAGE SIX - THE SECOND ARTICLE
August 8, 2024:
Jed Wallace is hired as crisis mitigation in the developing campaign to damage Baldoni, including his Bahai faith and Wayfarer.
August 10, 2024:
JA and MN discuss killing the 2 stories where both spoke really badly of JB, which later was attributed to the BL PR team and SJ.
JA was not a stranger to Stephanie Jones' tactics of getting her clients to hire her for crisis pr. Jennifer Abel and Melissa Nathan discuss how they helped to rewrite words within the page six article, to not draw attention to Baldoni. stating that, even though everything that was said in the article was not true, it was still horrible. And Baldoni should realize how lucky he is that neither of those articles were picked up. - Exhibit A, pages 131-133
Both of these articles were successfully killed because of Jed Wallace and rewritten thanks Melissa Nathan.
All of the above conversations were on JA's phone, so BL, LS and SJ were well aware at that time that, in fact, there was NO smear campaign orchestrated against her.
THE MAN WHO SHALL NOT BE NAMED aka JED WALLACE
Blake Lively and Stephanie Jones, in an attempt to prove a smear campaign against her (because she cannot possibly be disliked by people who thought her promotion of the movie was tone-deaf) and Jones dead set on revenge, confiscate Abel's phone on August 21st, 2024. To their disappointment (and our delight), not only do they find that Baldoni and Wayfarer have actively been killing negative stories about her and Justin, but also have hired a litigator who has started compiling evidence for CIVIL EXTORTION.
This is when I spoke with Omar from Tilted Lawyer, asking him what my strategy would be if I were in Lively's shoes, facing evidence of extortion against me and no evidence of smear campaign, making her list of 17 demands “moot.”
PLAN A: RYAN STARTS KISSING BALDONI'S PERINEUM ASS
First Ryan tries to buy the movie rights for a high price from Baldoni. Given what he had in his hands against them, it was deemed unsuccessful, of course. According to online articles, this would have taken place in mid September 2024.
As you can see in articles linked below, they are not smearing his name, but rather implying they would buy the franchise. Nobody is calling him a sexual predator now. The shift in tone is very telling. All articles are using the same quoted words, trying to lure Baldoni in. The articles came out all within 2 days of each other, parroting the same exact quotes from “sources.” If you read the articles, you will see how they all of a sudden became sheep. I am even more convinced of my theory now. Get ready to laugh at how the refer to Baldoni after August 21st, 2024.😀
September 15: “Ryan is willing to offer millions to Blake’s director and costar, Justin Baldoni”
(I GUESS HE’S THE DIRECTOR NOW?)
https://www.lifeandstylemag.com/posts/ryan-reynolds-willing-to-buy-out-director-justin-baldoni-excl/
September 16: “She also has been embroiled in a rumored feud with the film's director, Justin Baldoni, who also stars opposite Lively in the movie. The book's sequel, It Starts With Us, is also set to be filmed - but a new report claims Reynolds is willing to buy out Baldoni's stake in the franchise to ensure his wife doesn't have to work with the Jane The Virgin actor again.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13857507/blake-lively-ryan-reynolds-nyc-ends-buyout.htm
PLAN B: LET'S BEAT HIM TO THE PUNCH
While having used the 17 point claim to get JB and Wayfarer kicked out of their own movie, one thing they didn’t anticipate is that they would have to legally fight their “enemy.”
Facing the dilemma of covering her ass, in cohorts with her PR team, NYT (who apparently owes one to Leslie Sloane, because apparently she was her secret source) and with her lawyers, build a SH claim referring to her 17 point demands. Given what we know now, that’s exactly why BL’s case and narration of alleged SH scenes sound so vague and it sounds like her and her lawyers are blabbering on and on in her lawsuit, just like she does when she’s lying in her interviews. It is my understanding (speculation) the reason she didn’t know the dancing video had a sound recording is that at the time they were preparing their CRD complaint, she didn’t have access to the cuts anymore. Otherwise who would make that mistake? Anyway, as it predicted, Blake was set to paint herself as a victim, because she knew that she had to face an extortion claim head on, and had to sway public opinion before JB could do to her. As it is understood, JB never had an intention to sue her. But because JB and RR’s egos and need to win and come on top of someone having damning against them, was a no-go.. If you think about the fact that the CRD was filed in California, it makes sense that she only had that option, as the statute was three years. (this is only my understanding of why she filed there.) And given that NY has anti-slapp laws, it covered all her bases, including having her CRD reported on by NYT.
Who better to smear a man for SH than the one and only QUEEN of METOO? MEGAN TWOHEY- Pulitzer prize winner for public service in 2018, best known for her work with the “MeToo” movement, took down Harvey Weinstein with her colleague at New York Times. Allegedly , it was common knowledge that Leslie Sloane was Megan Twohey’s secret source. (This part is not confirmed, but is highly rumored and circulated in Hollywood apparently for years).
Interestingly, if you search anything relating Leslie Sloane and Megan Twohey, the whole internet is scraped off. (NICK SHAPIRO? IS THAT YOU?) If anyone can find reliable articles with sources, please feel free to share.
BLAKE AND RYAN PANIC OVER FREEDMAN'S PUBLIC STATEMENTS AND THE TRUTH COMING OUT
NOW THAT YOU HAVE KEPT UP WITH MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT, WE’RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.
Lively camp never expect Bryan Freedman to publish the website, exposing the actual truth. I believe they were hoping they would counter sue and settle behind closed doors. Which would later allow them to spin the narrative. But now they’ve found themselves all in deep.... waters?
That’s exactly why I think she filed 10 days after her CRD complaint, waiting to see Baldoni team's reaction. She has successfully completed spreading her false narrative of being SH-ed.
But one thing they couldn’t predict was the filing of EXHIBIT A, WHICH THEY HAVE BEEN DESPERATELY ASKING TO BE STRICKEN, BY EVERY Lively party! And this is why I think Ryan Reynolds acted so wildly in his MTD. Unfortunately for them, they could not get the AEO, and it seems like Baldoni will not back down, just like Bryan Freedman stated, until his clients are all fully exonerated.
AND THIS THEORY ALSO ANSWERED FURTHER MINOR QUESTIONS WHICH KEPT ON POPPING UP, HERE AND THERE:
-
Why didn’t any of her famous friends didn’t come to support? Because they were all aware of the upcoming case, and none of them wanted to be deposed. Joke’s on them though.
-
How can they claim that they had no power against Justin and Wayfarer? They had to bring in their billionaire investor/business partner into the lawsuit. If you pay attention, they wanted to portray him as a powerful evil person, by stating he vowed to spend 100 million to bring BL and RR down and dead set to see them dead, but not dead dead, like dead bodies in Israel, taking advantage of the political climate and being feared of being called an anti-semite. Additionally, they also had to link him to the sexual harassment, because they wouldn’t be able to prove the above statement, as it was important to be seen as poor Blake and poor Ryan fighting against a billionaire. And that’s why I think Blake had to remember when Stereve Sarowitz was on set, painting a story which would make everyone at Wayfarer look like perverts.
-
Why did the whole cast side with Blake? I think some of them believed Blake’s smear campaign against Baldoni within the cast, and some saw they power her and RR had, and she probably said that she will buy the rights to the movie so many, who wanted to be in the sequel, decided to side with her. - this is a reasonable speculation on my behalf. The only person who said anything was Hassan Minaj, who did not need BL and RR’s backing. If you take a closer look at all the cast, they were all somehow promised something, given gifts, to summarize it all, were all love bombed by the couple.
-
Colleen Hoover: This is my personal belief, but for the fanbase to be on Lively's side, they needed to pull in Colleen. Also parallel with the Deadpool franchise, I have a feeling they had potentially planned to request her to write further 1-2 books, and further produce other books of hers, to extend Blake’s new found franchise, which would make her as powerful as her husband.
-
Nick Shapiro: Civil Extortion can be tried as a criminal offense. I'm completely speculating here obviously. But based on how Bryan has been so confident, Baldoni must have DAMNING EVIDENCE.
That's why they need to keep their narrative of Blake being victim alive, as long as they can, while they try to find a way out. And this is exactly why they are not backing down, because that would be career ending, if it hasn't ended already.
BLAKE LIVELY WAS NEVER MEANT TO TO FILE THE LAWSUIT.
If you're not familiar with Ryan Reynolds' career, both before and after Deadpool, this is the perfect place to dive in. I explore the parallels between his successful career trajectory and Blake Lively’s, highlighting the similarities in their paths and why I think and believe Blake was aggressively trying to take over It Ends With Us.
Blake Lively seizes power behind the scenes by leveraging her status and making aggressive demands, forcing her way into the editing process, controlling marketing materials, and sidelining both the director and the studio. Through strategic manipulation, she pressures Wayfarer and Sony into conceding to her demands, ensuring her version of the film takes precedence and weakening Baldoni’s role in the project.
Was there a smear campaign? I do a deep dive into the events between July and August 2024, when both PR teams faced a difficult challenge of managing the public image of the film, Lively and Baldoni. This is a very crucial timeline to understand, in order to make sense of what we are all witnessing now.
If you’re already familiar with the intricate details leading up to August 21, 2024, let’s dive straight into the Anita's (my) theory and why I think we are witnessing the unexpected legal drama unfold in front of us; my POV on grave miscalculations of Blake Lively camp and Bryan Freedman's legal strategy, as I have observed it so far.